Philly Sports Record

Two out of three ain’t bad…

And by three I really mean one hundred.

Baseball America released their annual top 100 prospects list yesterday, and two current Phillies farmhands made the cut.

Domonic Brown (15) and Phillippe Aumont (93) are under the organization’s microscope now, and I’m curious to see how both players react to the sudden influx of media attention. From interviews I’ve seen/read so far in spring training, Brown sounds like he’ll be ready to take over for Jayson Werth in 2011 if need be, and Aumont seems primed to at least work on his secondary pitches as a starting pitcher in AA-Reading.

You might notice that four former Phillies also made the cut. Kyle Drabek (25), Michael Taylor (29), Jason Knapp (64), and Travis d’Arnaud (81) all once donned the organizational cap. But don’t get depressed. While the Phillies farm system is much weaker today than in previous seasons, remember that Drabek, Taylor and d’Arnaud were necessary pieces to acquire Roy Halladay for the next four years, and Knapp was a major piece in the trade that gave us 12 starts from Cliff Lee. It’s interesting to note that none of the other prospects in the deadline deal for Lee (Carlos Carrasco, Jason Donald, Lou Marson) were included in the top 100 list this year.

Check out a short clip of Domonic Brown, courtesy of MLB.com’s top 50 prospect rankings.

There are no words.

Kudos to Todd Zolecki for the picture.

Check back in this week to find out whose rotation has the best 1-2 punch in the game this year, and I’ll also tell you why Ruben Amaro might end up killing this team.

Let me breathe this in for a minute…

Looks like it really happened. He’ll speak to reporters on Friday.

photo courtesy Yong Kim.

Coulda woulda shoulda: what wasn’t meant to be

Browsing through baseball-reference.com at breakfast this morning, I started clicking my way through the amateur draft results of the past decade and nearly spit out my coffee thinking about what could have been.

The Phillies’ scouting and player development office, formerly led by Mike Arbuckle (who jumped ship to Kansas City after the 2008 championship), did a damn fine job drafting the bulk of today’s core. Since 2000, the Phillies’ first round picks go as follows:

2000: 2B Chase Utley (15th overall)
2001: RHP Gavin Floyd (4th overall)
2002: LHP Cole Hamels (17th overall)
2003: not awarded pick (Jim Thome signing)
2004: OF Greg Golson (21st overall)
2005: not awarded pick (Jon Lieber signing)
2006: RHP Kyle Drabek (18th overall), SS Adrian Cardenas (37th overall)
2007: LHP Joe Savery (19th overall), C Travis d’Arnaud (37th overall)
2008: SS Anthony Hewitt (24th overall), OF Zach Collier (34th overall)
2009: not awarded pick (Raul Ibanez signing)

In that list are two current all-stars, two prospects included in the package that acquired Roy Halladay, and another that helped net us Joe Blanton. Not bad at all.

But what caught my attention was the selection of Gavin Floyd in 2001. Drafted just behind Joe Mauer and Mark Prior, Floyd’s ascension through the Phillies’ minor league system was Hamels-esque (even though Cole wasn’t drafted until the next year). He threw a no-hitter in his first pro season at low-A Lakewood and made his major league debut in 2004 as a September callup. But his performance took a nightmarish turn after the season and he was twice demoted to the minor leagues in 2005 and 2006 after bouts of ineffectiveness. Looking to make a big splash in the offseason, then-GM Pat Gillick traded Floyd and two prospects to Chicago’s south side, netting Freddy Garcia in return. And we all know how that turned out.

A rotation of Cole Hamels, Brett Myers, Jon Lieber and Jamie Moyer was expected to be supplemented nicely with the likes of Garcia, despite his signs of wear with Chicago in 2006. Nope. He threw just 58 innings over 11 starts, amassing a 1.603 WHIP and a 1.9 HR/9 rating. Gillick was on the hook for Garcia’s $10M salary regardless of his performance, so the trade turned out to be a major dud. Floyd has gone on to experience some decent success in Chicago and signed a four year, $15.5M contract last March. Congrats Gavin, we wish you could have done it here.

Baseball is perhaps the toughest sport in which to gauge a prospect’s future success in the major leagues. Hell, Albert Pujols was a 13th round pick in 1999. Some prospects fizzle out into mediocrity, others end up in Cooperstown. But focusing on the 2001 draft, the Phillies selected Floyd ahead of Mark Teixeira (Rangers, 5th overall), David Wright (Mets, 38th overall), and Dan Haren (Cardinals, 72nd overall). Now imagine Wright completing an all-star home grown infield of Rollins, Utley and Howard. Or picture the current rotation with Dan Haren replacing Jamie Moyer.

Of course, there are countless variables that could have drastically altered the way those players’ careers would have ended up had they been drafted by Arbuckle & Co.But it’s nice to dream, isn’t it? For now, all we can really do is hope that Anthony Hewitt puts the pieces together this year.

A tale of two southpaws (Part Two)

Hopefully you’ve had some time to let the ideas behind BABIP and xFIP marinade in your head overnight, so I’ll jump right in.

I left off yesterday talking about J.A. Happ’s low BABIP in 2009, which is likely to normalize in 2010. Happ’s efficiency is a bit tougher to measure due to his lack of time in the majors and the fact that he bounced around the bullpen and starting rotation. But let’s have at it anyway:

Happ’s walk rate and strikeout rate vary a bit too much to safely conclude that he’s been consistent from year to year, but we must remember that the sample size from 2008 is very small. From a quick glance, I think it’s safe to say that Happ is still learning what kind of pitcher he really is.

Will we see a repeat of 2009’s performance? Absolutely not. His numbers just aren’t sustainable. Keep in mind that the league average BABIP in 2008 and 2009 was .301 and .302, respectively, and it’s clear to see that Happ is due for some degree of regression. Note the tremendous difference in ERA and xFIP over the past two seasons. A low BABIP combined with an impossibly low split when pitching with runners in scoring position is bound to bring his basic numbers back down to earth.

The league average split for pitchers throwing with runners in scoring position last season was .260/.353/.404 with a .295 BABIP; the true definition of average. With runners in scoring position, Happ pitched to a tune of .158/.253/.226 with a BABIP of .181. Happ’s performance, noting that batting average, on-base percentage, slugging percentage and BABIP were all at least 100 points lower than league average is shocking, and damn near unheard of.

Happ still has plenty of time to grow, but I’m curious to see how he reacts when he can’t match the expectations of the new season. Many fans thought it was crazy to toss his name around in the Roy Halladay trade talks, but I’m a firm believer that we should have sold high on him while we could. Thanks for former GM J.P. Ricciardi, Toronto has a history of using sabermetrics to grade players in their front office, so there’s a chance that they took a deeper look at Happ’s statistics and made note of his impending regression and fittingly dropped his name from the conversation.

On the plus side, Happ could still be that league average #4 starter with flashes of brilliance for the Phillies. Being cost-controlled for the next three years doesn’t hurt matters either, as the Phillies payroll is already locked in at $130M in 2011.

A tale of two southpaws (Part One)

Welcome to Part One of a two-part series that will show you how Cole Hamels’ 2009 campaign wasn’t nearly as bad as you thought and why J.A. Happ won’t be nearly as good in 2010. By the time we’re through, you’ll know a little bit more about BABIP, xFIP, and why it might have been a good idea to trade Happ this past offseason.

We’re just six days away from Roy Halladay reporting for duty as pitchers and catchers arrive at Bright House Field in sunny Clearwater where the sunshine brings 60-degree temperatures in mid-February. Dammit, New Jersey.

I don’t see much reason to worry about Halladay. Hell, he’s Roy Halladay. Instead, many eyes will focus on Cole Hamels this spring, who is expected to rebound from what most fans would call an ineffective 2009 season. Another major storyline to keep your eye on is J.A. Happ and his pursuit of success at the major league level. But he’s going to regress, and regress hard, no matter how much you don’t want to admit it.

Taking a look at the basic numbers, it would appear that Happ had a much better year than Hamels in 2009. Take a look for yourself:

Hamels suffered from a ballooned ERA, a H/9 ratio that took a major leap from 7.6 in 2008 to 9.6 in 2009, and a WHIP that increased by more than 0.2. The only thing that Happ seemed to struggle with was a low K:BB ratio, but everything else looks just fine. So how could one pitcher go from World Series MVP to dud and another go from fringe prospect to Rooke of the Year runner-up?

There is one common link: BABIP.

BABIP, or Batting Average on Balls In Play,  is a statistic that accounts for any ball put into play that a fielder can manipulate. Home runs and strikeouts are not counted in BABIP because the fielder can’t catch a ball ten rows deep in the stands or make a defensive play on a strikeout. BABIP has the tendency to level out around .300 for the league by the end of each season, proven by 2008’s league average BABIP mark of .301 and .302 in 2009.

Honestly, BABIP does a good job telling us how lucky a pitcher was in a given performance. Say Cole Hamels is facing Brian McCann, who bloops a soft fly ball behind first base. Ryan Howard, Chase Utley and Jayson Werth converge but fail to communicate as the ball drops in the grass for what Tim McCarver would call a “check swing plop job.” It may sound like a defensive gaffe but that bloop single would ultimately raise Hamels’ BABIP.  The bottom line is that the ball fell for a hit. BABIP doesn’t account for defensive positioning or fielder miscommunication.

With that in mind, take a look at Cole’s BABIP and a few other metrics over the past two seasons:

Hamels saw his BABIP take a major leap from .270 in 2008 to .325 in 2009. A BABIP as low as .270 just isn’t sustainable over the long run, so it was expected to rise last season. But an increase of 55 points is astronomical for a pitcher to withstand, which can explain why his H/9 ratio and WHIP took such a beating.

Since I’ve got your attention, take a look at xFIP (Expected Fielding Independent Pitching). This is a really helpful tool that shows what a pitcher’s ERA really should be, based on the outcomes he can truly control — walks, strikeouts and home runs; then normalizes the home run component based on his fly balls and home ballpark. By taking these variables into account, xFIP will show you how effective a pitcher really was by removing defense from the equation.

As you look across the board you’ll notice that his xFIP, BB/9, K/9 and HR/9 are nearly identical from 2008 to 2009. Hamels’ K:BB ratio actually improved based on fewer innings pitched last season.

The correlation between BABIP and basic numbers like ERA and WHIP is undeniable. Believe it or not, Hamels still had a pretty damn good year. He was just the victim of bad luck.

On the other side of the coin is J.A. Happ, who was the beneficiary of a .270 BABIP in 2009. While Happ lacks some of the skill and major league experience that Hamels possesses,  a low BABIP and a massive amount of help from his defense helped him post an outstanding ERA and fool thousands of Phillies fans into believing he’s a legitimate #2 starter.

Unfortunately for the masses, that’s just not the case. Check back in tomorrow and I’ll show you exactly why Happ will regress.

We’re back!

Well, let me be the first to apologize for such a disgustingly long delay between posts. But with three feet of snow on the ground and no other option but to listlessly watch the Sixers all winter, it’s a relief to know that it’s nearly time for pitchers and catchers to report to Clearwater where the annual snowfall total is currently less than 70 inches. What? I don’t even remember what the ground looks like.

We’re going to be focusing primarily on baseball just like before. Sure, I’ll throw some Sixers and Flyers updates in there once in a while and I’ve been working on getting an Eagles contributor for the site, but the winter sports are merely the redheaded stepchildren here. We’ll slide them scraps under the door, but they’ll stay out of the way for the most part.

I’ve got a lot of new ideas for the site this year, so keep checking in and counting down to Opening Day!

Rauuuuul vs. Pat the Bat

Some early morning food for thought in cost-per-item form:

Enjoy your Saturday.